A WORD OF CAUTION TO THE
KAFIR HINDU
A WORD OF CAUTION TO THE KAFIR
HINDU
Many Hindus in their eagerness to emphasise that there
is no fundamental difference between a practicing Moslem and a
Hindu, often overstep certain limits without realizing an
important fact. In India, it is common practice to mention
that the Moslems of India (who had been crying hoarse for so
many years that they belong to a different race because of
their Moslem faith and so cannot live together with the
Hindus) are really descendants of the same ancestors. These
Hindus good-naturedly but foolishly imply that the Moslems
are as proud of their common heritage as are the Hindus of
India for instance.
Not knowing the make-up of the mind of a practicing
Moslem, these Hindus forget the fact that in Islam, anything
that had existed before the acceptance of the prophet's faith
is considered the remnant of the Dark Age or 'jahiliya'. For a
converted Moslem or a Moslem whose ancestors were convert-
ed several generations ago, his ancient Hindu roots are not a
subject of pride. He feels insulted when a Hindu tries to
equate him with his pre-lslamic ancestors, and thereby derives
some sort of a satisfaction by implying that they, the Moslem
and the Hindu, are more or less of the same category in the
context of the nation at large. The Hindu does not realize
that the Hindu heritage of India is a shameful thing to his
Moslem compatriot. It always has been and is going to be that
way as long as the Koran's injunctions are obeyed by the
faithful.
It is practically impossible for the two communities to
mix and mingle as normal people do. The Moslems keep their
women away f ram other males while a Hindu, a Sikh or a
Christian attends social gatherings together with their women-
folk. You never find a 'true' non-Moslem friend for a
practicing Moslem. And this is true for any country, where
people of different faiths live together. The Koran's injunc-
tions are quite clear on the subject. It forbids a Moslem to
make friends with the infidels. That they belong to the same
country is not so important. For a Moslem of India, a Saudi
Moslem who is an alien in the common international parlance,
is nearer to him than the Hindu or Christian who lives next
door.
The inherent separatism preached by Islam is a point
that many kafirs lose sight of and come to regret later.
Barring a few exceptions, the great majority of Moslems do
not consider themselves part of the national mainstream, if
the country happens to be a 'darul-Harb'. It does not matter
how many high positions are offered to the Moslems as a
gesture of good-will, in his mind he considers himself quite
separate from the unbelievers. In a darul-lslam like Pakistan
or Bangladesh for instance, one does not see any Hindu or
Christian people at high level jobs, be it in the administration,
the foreign service, the army, navy or air force. Invariably,
the difference in the two attitudes comes to be realized by the
non-Moslems much too late to their chagrin. There was a
reason for Pakistan being created and the same forces are still
in operation in the rest of India as in Lebanon. There are
people who compare Pakistan and Bangladesh as safe deposit
accounts for the Islamics while secular India is a kind of joint
account where the Moslems share the wealth of the country
along with the rest of the population. Pakistan and Bangladesh
of course prevent the non-Moslem population of these
countries all rights of becoming citizens.
William K. Stevens of NY Times wrote recently:
"When the Roman Empire was dying and much classical
learning lay in ashes, and the Dark Ages were descending
on the West, there flourished on the plains of northern
India not only the most civilized culture of its time, but
also one of the most creative in history.
"There, under the Gupta emperors, 1000 years before
Galileo and Kepler and Newton, Indian thinkers develop-
ed a revolutionary idea without which modern science
could not exist: the concept of mathematical zero,
along with the related system of numerals that is called
Arabic but was, in fact, invented here. By the fifth
century, an Indian had discovered the Earth's axial
rotation. Well before the Renaissance re-illuminated
Europe, Indian mathematicians had explored the upland
realms of quadratic equations and cube roots, had be-
come the first to assign 3.1416 as the value of 'pi', and
had mastered the concept of infinity. Throughout most
of history, in fact, Indian science and Indian culture
generally matched and at times exceeded anything any-
where else in the world".
The advent of the Moslem hordes from west Asia, and
their concept of 'jahiliya' combined with the Hindus' misplaced
humanitarian attitude toward the invaders greatly damaged this
civilization of the kafirs.
The Hindus of India should be aware of the three
principal sources of danger that can come from the Islamic
ideology, an ideology that does not recognize the existence of
any other faith or culture on this earth.
DANGER 1:
This of course is the usual battle and direct confronta-
tion with the invader. The kafir has defeated the Moslem
many times but not having known the nature of his adversary,
let him go after defeating him. The Moslem came back with
heavier and heavier reinforcement and if the kafir lost a single
battle, then that was the end of him, and often the end of his
people and dynasty. The kafir's negligence in delivering proper
retribution made him pay dearly. History is a residual
chronicle of such incidents.
DANGER 2:
When the Moslem found that the attitude of the kafir
had hardened, he had recourse to subterfuge. To soften up the
kafir's attitude toward Islam, a new sect, the Sufis were
created. The decision to create this sect was first taken in a
secret religious meeting in Baghdad in the year 1180 A.D. The
idea was to show the kafirs the gentler side of Islam. The
Sufis adopted many of the religious tenets of the kafirs such as
tolerance, compassion and charity to all instead of being
selective as in Islam. The Sufis did succeed considerably in
the enterprise and the Hindus became the disciples of these
Sufis in great numbers. In many instances, a Sufi had more
Hindu followers than Moslems.
The main body of the Moslems did not accept the Sufis
as their religious leaders. However, for 'other reasons' they
were tolerated by the Moslem king or 'amir-ul-mominin'. In
the case of the fundamentalist kings like Aurangzib, this did
not work out. Aurangzib executed the renowned Sufi Sarmad
during his reign.
When the time for final onslaught came, the Sufis were
no where to be found. Behold! They were on the side of the
Moslem attackers who were being directed by the Sufi holymen
themselves, along with the usual fire-belching mullahs that
accompanied the invaders. The Sufis showed the invaders the
places to loot, edifices to destroy, and any secret hiding places
that the kafirs might have. This in the end, and at great
sacrifice, opened the eyes of the kafirs and the influence of
the Sufis among the kafirs dwindled. But by then great chunks
of the kafir territory had been annexed by the Moslems.
DANGER 3:
Of all three, this is the most dangerous source of
turmoil.
There is a breed of kafir leaders who claim to represent
the interests of the kafirs, but in reality they look after their
own interests as well as the interests of the Moslems, letting
down the kafirs every time. Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit
Nehru were such leaders. India's current prime minister Indira
Gandhi is another example.
Mahatma Gandhi was born and brought up among the
Moslems of Gujarat [1]. His entire education from schools in
India to Law college in London was paid for by his Moslem
guardian. His business in South Africa was also established at
the Moslem's expense. Gandhi was hired by a wealthy Moslem
businessman in South Africa. His entire educational life was
spent living among the Moslems. In London, he was part of the
Anjurnane Islamiah which later developed into Muslim League.
His knowledge of Hindu scriptures was superficial at best.
In order to bring the Hindus and the Moslems together,
Gandhi used to introduce Islamic tenets into Hindu prayers.
The Moslems hardly attended his prayers and refused out of
hand any such mixing of the two religions in his prayers. In
one of his post-prayer speeches delivered on 6th April, 1947
(the year India was partitioned), he said: "Hindus should
never
be angry against the Moslems, even if the latter might make
up their mind to undo even their existence. If they put all of
us to the sword, we should court death bravely. We should
never fear death. We are destined to be born and die; why
should we feel gloomy over it? If all of us die with a smile on
our lips, we shall enter a new life. We shall originate a new
Hindusthan."
Gandhi supported the Khilafat movement. It must be
recalled that the Khilafat (or Caliphate of the Turkish king,
after the first world war) was totally unworthy of support of
the progressive Moslems. Kemal Ataturk established this fact
by abolition of the Khilafat. The abolition of the Khilafat was
widely welcomed by enlightened Moslem opinion the world
over and Kemal was the undoubted hero of all young Moslems
fighting against Imperial domination. But Gandhi used to
frequent the most fanatic type of Moslems and he gave his full
support to this movement. The apostle of non-violence sent an
invitation to the king of Afghanistan to attack India to rid the
country of all kafirs. Gandhi was ignorant of the fact that the
first four Caliphs were the real ones and the rest were
spurious.
The forcible conversion of Hindus was happening all over
India at this time, and for the first time a Hindu monk carte
up reconverting them back to Hinduism, a deed that was
neglected by the Hindu religious leaders for many years. The
name of this monk was Swami Shraddhananda. The Moslems
could not tolerate this kind of re-conversion and one day one
Moslem young man, one Abdul Rashid murdered the monk.
The Moslems all over the country were jubilant. One Asaf Ali
came forward to defend the assassin but his guilt was estab-
lished and Abdul Rashid was hanged by the British. Later,
Pandit Nehru hired this Asaf All as India's ambassador to tile
United States.
Mahatma Gandhi, who had not assented to put his
signature to a petition for saving the lives of great patriots
like Bhagat Singh and others, because they took part in
violence, and had also for the same reason called Shivaji, Rana
Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh, all Hindu heroes, as 'misguided
patriots', did not however, look upon Rashid's act in that light.
No one had ever heard Mr. Gandhi denounce the acts of
bigotry of Aurangzib or Shah Jahan either.
Gandhi took the murderer Suhrawardy under his wings
when Suhrawardy was sought by the young men of Bengal to
avenge the gruesome murder of Haren Ghosh.
Gandhi gave his full support to All Brothers who had
more than once affirmed their loyalty to the doctrine of Pan-
Islamism.
Mahatma Gandhi's sayings in the wake of the Moplah [2]
riots in Kerala are noteworthy. Moplahs had originally rebell-
ed against the British but the British repressed them savagely.
Moplahs, defeated and frustrated, now turned their wrath
against the unsuspecting Hindus; for the Hindus, in their eyes
were as much kafirs as the British. The Hindu who had lost
himself in chanting 'Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai' (Hindus and
Moslems are brothers), was attacked by the Moslem chanting
'Allahu-Akbar' (Allah is great, the battle cry against the ka-
firs). The number of Hindus murdered was 3000; the number
of those forcibly converted, over 20,000 and property looted
about Rs30 million. There was no end to molestations and
abductions of Hindu women.
Dr. Annie Besant stated: "They murdered and plundered
abundantly, and killed or drove all Hindus who would not
apostatize. Somewhere about one hundred thousand people
were driven from their homes with nothing but the clothes
they had on, stripped of everything...Malabar has taught us
what Islamic rule still means, and we do not want to see
another specimen of the Khilafat Raj in India. How sympathy
with the Moplahs is felt by the Muslims outside Malabar has
been proved by the defense raised by them for their fellow
believers, and by Mr. Gandhi himself, who stated that they had
acted as they believed that religion taught them to act. I felt
that this is true; but there is no place in a civilized land for
people who drive away out of the country those who refuse to
apostatize from their ancestral faiths."
In reference to Moplah rioters, Gandhi said: "They are
a brave God-fearing people who were fighting for what they
consider as religion, and in a manner which they considered
religious."
Gandhi had assured all Indians at the time of partition
that India could only be divided over his dead body. The
gullible kafirs found him still alive and well although the
country was divided and millions murdered in the process.
Gandhi's Islamic upbringing, however, was clearly evi-
dent in his sexual aberrations. He used to sleep with multiple
vomen, mostly very young, completely nude. The practice
vas kept a secret for a long time but finally was found out at
the Sabaramati Ashram. He gave up beating his wife Kasturba
only on his arrival in India. Gandhi practiced the Islamic tenet
of beating the wife on a regular basis when he was in South
Africa.
The upbringing of Pandit Nehru was entirely Islamic and
he was proud of the fact. His name Jawaharlal Nehru was
Persian and Islamic. He used to boast that he was culturally
Islamic and a Hindu only by accident. He used this accidental
fact over and over again as his claim to the leadership of the
Hindus in his encounters with the Muslim League led by
Mohammed All Jinnah and every time he let the Hindus down.
Once at ter the country was divided and an orgy of
murder, arson and rape was continuing on the Pakistani side of
the border and Hindu and Sikh refugees were streaming in, the
Pandit declared over the radio that all refugees should forgive
the Moslems for all that the Moslems had done to them and
not think of revenge. The radio broadcast was heard in all
refugee camps in Delhi, Amritsar, Ludhiana, Jullunder, etc.
Next morning, Nehru accompanied by Indira Gandhi, his daugh-
ter went to visit one of the camps. Indira Gandhi was just
behind Pandit Nehru and a very old man, an octogenarian,
touched the hand of Indira Gandhi, a girl of his grand-
daughter's age. Nehru flared up and slapped the old man, an
eminent businessman from Lahore, who was now a pauper.
Instead of getting angry, the old man laughed out loud
to Nehru's face and said: "You spoke over the radio last
night
and advised us not to be revengeful but forgiving toward the
Moslems. Your daughter is like my grand-daughter; you
yourself are like my son in age. What did I do wrong in
touching the hand of your daughter to attract your attention?
You flew into a rage and slapped me! And you advised me
over the radio to calm my anger? Do you know, three of my
daughters were taken away by force by the Moslems from my
home and I should not be angry? What gives you the right to
slap me just for touching your daughter?" The Moslem-loving
Pandit moved away like a dog with his tail between his legs.
The Hindus 'must' avoid choosing false leaders. Leaders
who make use of their political position to advertise their own
idiosyncrasies are not good leaders. Morarji Desai was one
such leader who advertised his urine therapy as soon as he
became India's prime minister. Until then, he had never
mentioned it. One wonders what prime ministership has got to
do with urine therapy? Some think that Gandhi, Nehru and
Desai behaved in such shameful way in order to get recogni-
tion from the public.
Aurangzib used to destroy the Hindus' houses of worship
their schools and libraries with the help of his army. Nehru did
the same in a much more refined way. When the Nagariunsa-
gara Dam was completed and it was going to be filled up with
water, Nehru at the advice of some of his Moslem secretaries,
raised the level of water much above the level initially fixed
by the engineers. This was done to drown a lot more Hindu
temples than were originally estimated. He had no empathy
for the ancient heritage of the Hindus having been brought up
in Islamic atmosphere himself. He read about the ancient
glory of the Hindu civilization in later years and used to boast
of having discovered India himself in his late life.
Nehru gave away an Indian enclave to Pakistan without
first getting the approval of the Indian Parliament [3]. When the
Pakistanis attacked India without any provocation and India
sustained heavy losses, Nehru threw in Hindu and Sikh soldiers
to protect the Moslem inhabitants of Kashmir from the attack
of the invaders. Eventually, the Indian army pushed back the
Pakistanis and just when the Indian army was to launch a
punishing attack on the Moslems, Nehru stopped the Indians
and went to settle the dispute to the United Nations Assembly.
Since then, the problem has lingered and Nehru succeeded in
getting the Hindus in a situation that no pandit [4] worth his
name should have done.
Pandit ;9ehru's fraternizing with the Moslems was pheno-
menal. In fact, people used to say that in the whole of India,
there was only one nationalist Moslem and that was Pandit
Nehru. The implication was that the real Moslems were NOT
nationalists but fundamentalists, who were Moslems first and
Indians second.
Indira Gandhi, the current prime miniter has also more
Moslem family friends than Hindus. She hates to be identified
faith the Hindus on whose support she has become the prime
minister. She had once declared that she would hate to have a
Hindu as her husband. It is only for political reasons that of
late she has started visiting Hindu temples. Her son Sanjay
Gandhi (alias Sanjeev) was dr0mcised like a Moslem child [5].
When the 90,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered to the
kafir army of India, Indira Gandhi fed these ruffians and
dged and clothed them, for months, instead of trying them
for having killed innocent kafirs in East Pakistan, raping their
women and burning their homes, nearly three million of them.
She did not bring any charge against the captured soldiers and
their generals. Everyone was released and let go back to
Pakistan scat free while the Hindu and Sikh soldiers that
Pakistan had captured, were mostly murdered by Pakistan in
the prison camps and very few were returned.
Indira Gandhi allowed Moslem infiltrators to come to
India from Bangladesh and gave them citizenship papers while
the bonafide Hindu refugees from Islamic Bangladesh did not
receive any welcome. Her treatment of the Hindu refugees
leaves much to be desired. This is in stark contrast with the
treatment of Moslems who had left India at the time of
partition but came back later. These turn-coats were welcom-
ed with open arms in Kashmir and elsewhere.
Another Moslem gentlemen, who was a family friend of
the Nehrus, was one Syud Husain. He had once eloped with
Indira's aunt Vijay Lakshmi Pandit, who later occupied the
highest post of the United Nations. This Syud Husain was later
hired by Nehru in the Indian Foreign Service and made India's
ambassador to Egypt. When he died, the government of India
erected a mausoleum in his honor in Cairo. On the other hand,
not even a small brick pillar has been built by the Nehru or
Gandhi government of India for the three million kafirs
murdered in East and West Pakistans by the Moslems of West
Pakistan.
Consider the case of the 50 new mosques which currently
are being built in one of the holiest Hindu cities of India,
Mathura. It is here that the Krishna temple was destroyed so
many times by Aurangzib and Ahmed Shah Abdali. Hindus have
rebuilt the temple at an adjacent place, as the old foundation
could not be built upon, the Moslems having built a mosque on
the old emplacement. The mosque could have been destroyed
by the Hindus too as it is a Hindu city and very few Moslems
live there today. But the Hindus did not do that. They left
the mosque in peace and built a new Krishna temple near the
old site.
The other day Rukmini Arundale met Mrs. Gandhi. She
had two requests to make to the P.M. She said that the
government of India should assess the Saudi money entering
the country to subvert Hindu culture. She also asked the
P.M. to find out if Saudi petrodollars were financing the
construction of fifty new mosques in Mathura. The P.M. was
not even aware of these goings on and a quick inquiry revealed
that it was indeed a fact that the Saudis were financing
mosque building in Mathura.
Now, the fact is that the mosque once built by Aurangzib
remains mostly unattended in Mathura. There are not too
many Moslems in this heavily populated Hindu city. What are
the Moslems going to do with not one but fifty new mosques
there?
But from the nuisance point of view these mosques can
create a lot of trouble. The Moslems are supposed to pray five
times a day and thus five times fifty or two hundred and fifty
times a day, the powerful microphones will blare out the
Arabic chantings, creating a lot of bad blood and invading the
privacy of the Hindu pilgrims. The tolerance of the kafirs is
being stretched a little too far by the P.M. of India. Just to
think that a kafir cannot even travel to Mecca, not to speak of
building fifty or even one temple or church or synagogue there
and the prime minister of India is not even aware of the
serious enterprise in Mathura that is calculated to disturb the
peace in a Hindu holy city! Can things become worse than
that? This behavior of the current P.M. of India is due to her
Islamic upbringing. A lot of harm will come to the kafirs of
India from this source alone, if they are not careful.
Indira Gandhi promoted a Kashmiri Moslem to the post
of India's ambassador and a cabinet minister whose capabilities
can well be described by his propensity to procure prostitutes
in Europe at the expense of the Indian taxpayers. This Moslem
gentlemen used to draw 100 Swiss francs from the entertain-
ment account every day for a prostitute when the late N.
Gopalaswamy Ayyangar went to attend the Kashmir meeting
in Geneva. If only poor Indians knew how their hard-earned
money was being spent by a Moslem under the patronage of
Mrs. Gandhi; and to think that the Koran forbids prostitution!
[6].
Another source of danger comes from the priests of the
kafirs. Many of them, though supposedly priests, do not know
the basic fundamentals of the Hindu faith. They hale neglect-
ed the lower castes of the Hindus and often subscribed to their
persecution for ages.
Many of these priests are paid money to lend their
services to undertake enterprises calculated toorode the
Hindu society. Rama Krishna Math of Madras is one such
organization. For money received f rom the govenment of
India, this organization publishes and distributes the teachings
of the Koran to the Hindus and other kafirs. The teethings are
misleading and written up to resemble Hindu teachings. The
book entitled 'thus Spake Prophet Muhammad' published by the
Rama Krishna Math does NOT present the true injunctions of
the Koran that refer to the kafirs. The book has been
presented as a benign book, preaching precepts that are
similar to the techings of the Buddha, Lord Krishna and other
Hindu incarnations.
Perhaps the most surprising thing, is that none of these
Hindu kafir monks have read the Koran but glibly proclaim that
Islam preaches the same kind of message that one receives
from the Bible or the Tripitaka (the holy trod of the
Buddhists) or the Vedas of the Hindus. Most of these monks
'pretend' to have read the Islamic holy books. In reality they
are too lazy to delve into Allah's injunctions for i] they did,
they would have found out that the first thing Allah wants is
to decimate these priests who have placed rivals of Allah for
their worship. In fact, these Hindu kafir monks are really
cheating their community and misguiding the Hindu kafirs who
listen to them.
The Moslems like everyone else respect the strong. The
saying goes: "Mushalam manati yah sah Mushalmanah asti"
which means that Moslem respects the clout or 'mushalam' and
so he is called a 'mushalman'.
Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi failed to be strong with the
Moslems. They were incapable of planning wisely, daring
boldly and achieving strenuously or of wresting victory from
the jaws of defeat by desperate effort or heroic endurance.
Whenever the going got tough, Nehru went to Lord Mount-
batten or to the United Nations and Gandhi fasted. In spite of
a few dams and steel mills which were built by the foreigners
anyway like the movie "Gandhi", the fact remains that
Nehru
and Gandhi together have saddled India's kafirs with un-
necessary problems which of course they have to solve now by
themselves. The mitigating factor, is the absence of these
two 'holier than thou' politicians. That, itself might make
matters easier.
Swami Vivekananda had said: "For instance, the Moham-
medan religion allows Mohammedans to kill all who are not of
their religion. It is clearly stated in the Koran. "Kill the
infidels if they do not become Mohammedans." They must be
put to fire and sword. Now if you tell a Mohammedan that
this is wrong, he will naturally ask. "How do you know that?
How do you know it is not good? My book says it is." You say
your book is older; there will come the Buddhist, and say, my
book is much older still. Then will come the Hindu, and say,
my books are the oldest of all. Therefore, referring to books
will not do ...
"No amount of books can help us to become purer. The
only power is in realization, and that lies in ourselves and
comes from thinking. Let me think. A clod of earth never
thinks; but it remains only a lump of earth. The glory of man
is that he is a thinking being. It is the nature of man to think
and therein he differs from animals. I believe in reason,
having seen enough of the evils of authority, for I was born in
a country where they have gone to the extreme of authority."
It is therefore extremely important for the kafirs to
learn about Islam and its attitude toward them. Any attempt
to protect the life, limb, culture, and property of the kafirs
should start f ram an adequate knowledge of the edicts of
Islam. Thus knowledge of the Koran is very important to the
kafir, not only as a source of general knowledge but also as a
means for survival.
There are strong indications that the Moslem countries
of west Asia have laid a deep-seated plot to Islamise India
before the Hindus and other non-Moslems of the subcontinent
wake up to the fact. The half-lslamised current rulers of India
and some misguided Hindu religious organizations are at work
to help the Moslem Arabs in their sinister enterprise. The
Moslem residents of India, who overnight have become cham-
pions of secularism, are like a dagger poised at the heart of
the darul-Harb, that is India. Time for action and organization
has come.
Footnotes
1. Some say that Gandhi's natural father was the Moslem
employer of Gandhi's father. Gandhi's father used to
work for a Moslem landowner and had stolen money from
the cash box and had fled. He was a fugitive for three
years and his wife was taken over by the Moslem
landlord and placed in his harem. Gandhi was born
during this period when his father was a fugitive. There
are people who assert that Gandhi's father used to come
inside the harem like a thief to sleep with his wife, and
he indeed was the true father but that seems to be highly
unlikely. However! Gandhi had promised to his mother
to be a strict vegetarian. This promise he kept all
throughout his life. Otherwise he was a servant of Islam
in his political dealings.
2. Moplahs are Moslems from the Malabar area in Kerala,
South India.
3. Berubari was ceded to East Pakistan without previously
asking the opinion of the residents of Berubari.
4. Pandit; a learned man.
5. Dark thoughts cross many minds at the uncanny likeness
of Sanjay with one Mohammed Yunus, a family friend of
the Nehrus. Like Yunus, Sanjay too had a hot temper
and inclination toward breaking the law. Sanjay had a
clash with the British law and he changed his name from
Sanjeev to Sanjay then to get out of the law's reach. A
son of Yunus (Shahriyar by name) is still serving sentence
in a US prison. Sanjay had a balding pate like Yunus has.
The other brother, Rajiv is of an entirely different
disposition and physical appearance. Sanjay's marriage
took place in the house of Mohammed Yunus and at
Sanjay's death, Yunus displayed publicly his uncontroll-
able grief when he sobbed and wept relentlessly.
6. The Moslem diplomatts name is Mohammed Shafi
Qureshi. Qureshi is an honorable name is Islam.
If
you enjoyed this article, please visit: http://www.hinduunity.org
|
