ISLAM IN ACTION III
ISLAM IN ACTION III
A.GHOSH
a) KAFIR-KUSHI A LA SURAH VIII, VERSE 12
Around 1689 A.D. the Hindu king Shambhaji, son of Shivaji,
was captured by Aurangzib's men. The Hindu king was
murdered along with his minister Kavi Kalash. There are
many ways of killing a defeated foe. Freeing a defeated foe
after the battle, like the Hindu kings used to do or the Indian
government did when they freed without trial the criminal
elements of the Moslem Pakistani prisoners captured in the
then East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), was of course unthink-
able in Islamic ethics and more so if the foe was a kafir, an
enemy of Allah and the prophet Mohammed. Kafirs were
killed in a more sophisticated way, the way prescribed by the
Koran. Chopping a kafir's head off at a single stroke of the
sword or crushing his head in a single blow was considered too
mild. The idea was to make the pain last, as long as possible.
Thus in Islam's hell, a kafir burns but his skin goes on growing
to be burnt continuously so that the pain becomes everlasting.
Death is the termination of all pains and so it must be delayed
to teach a lesson and to prove without fail the greatness of
Allah's religion.
SHAMBHAJl WAS FIRST BLINDED AND KAVI KALASH'S
TONGUE WAS PULLED OUT. ON MARCH ll, 1689, THEY
WERE PUT TO A CRUEL AND PAINFUL DEATH. THEIR
LIMBS WERE HACKED OFF ONE BY ONE AND THEIR
FLESH THROWN TO THE DOGS.
It was in the year 1669 A.D. that the Hindu king Gokla was
Captured by Aurangzib. THE HINDU KING'S LIMBS WERE
HACKED OFF ONE BY ONE ON THE PLATFORM OF THE
POLICE STATION OF AGRA, THE CITY OF TAJ MAHAL.
HIS WHOLE FAMILY WAS FORCIBLY CONVERTED TO
ISLAM.
One might think that such gruesome murders committed in
accordance with the injunctions of the Koran are a thing of
the past. But it is not so. The following incident proves it.
Bengal in pre-partition India was then being ruled by Suh-
rawardy, the Muslim League leader. Suhrawardy had laid a
diabolical plan to destroy the Hindu city of Calcutta. One Mr.
Haren Ghosh, a music teacher who used to give lessons in
music to the girls of Suhrawardy's family, came to know of the
plot and he informed the authorities. Calcutta was saved at
the nick of time and eventually Suhrawardy came to know that
his plans were divulged by his music teacher. Mr. Ghosh was
kidnapped, his limbs were hacked off one by one and his cut up
body was found in a box that was left in a Calcutta street.
And this happened in the 1940's. Islam has not changed and
those who think otherwise only fool themselves.
Even today the Sheikhs of Arabia make sick jokes when they
ask their non-Moslem friends if they had a choice which one
would they choose for their death: death by a single stroke
severing the head or death by chopping their limbs off one by
one.
b) ISLAM AND KAFIR WOMEN
The chapter on the Koran and Moslem women gives us some
idea on Islam's injunctions on Moslem women. They should
cover their bodies from head to foot. Khomeini's Iran forces
the women to go under the 'chador'. They must not go outside
to work where other men might see them. They may not be
rulers or judges in an Islamic state. Women lawyers are
frowned upon in today's Pakistan which is an Islamic state.
But such regulations are valid for Moslem women only. The
non-Moslem or kafir women are to be handled differently, as
the Islamic codes are not birding on them. The kafir women
are considered to be the property of Moslems; they are their
'slaves'' and the wife or daughter of a 'zimmi' can be molested
by a Moslem with impunity in a Moslem state ruled by the
'Sharia' or Islamic jurisprudence. The idea comes from the
treatment meted out to kafir women who were captured in the
battlefield. The first fifth of all booty went to the prophet or
the caliph or whoever happened to hold the position of the
amir-ul-mominin. It could be the Moslem king of the land or
even a petty chieftain. This so called leader 'examined' all
booty, inspected and sometimes 'felt' by touching it. The
women, all of them were paraded in front of the leader, naked
or scantily clad, so that the leader could make his choice.
These women were NOT brought in front of the 'amir-ul-
mominin' dressed in 'chadors'. It was thus that the prophet
himself used to inspect his captives and chose Rehana and
Juwairiya' both Jewish women whose male relatives were all
killed by the Moslems. Juwairiya eventually gave up her
religion and married the prophet and became one of the ten or
eleven wives of his harem. Rehana was a courageous lady and
she did not give up her Jewish faith and so was turned into a
concubine of the prophet. She thus took her place on the side
of Mary, another slave woman, and a Christian, who after
Khadija gave birth to a male child fathered by the prophet.
Although the number of legal wives for Moslems is limited to
four, there is no limit to the number of concubines a faithful
servant of Allah could have. The practice eventually gave rise
to immense seraglios or 'harems' in Islamic lands. IN INDIA,
THE CAPTIVE WOMEN OF THE KAFIRS WERE INSPECTED
BY THE MOSLEM KINGS IN WOMEN'S MARKETS CALLED
MINA BAZAARS (MARKETS OF PEARLS) WHERE NO MALES
OTHER THAN THE KING AND HIS PALS WERE ALLOWED
ENTRY. They used to choose their favorite girls for the night
and then let them circulate among their Moslem friends.
These unfortunate women had usually a very sad end. Anyone
who has visited the Mughal palaces and forts in India must
have seen the steep tunnels from the 'harem' opening on to the
waterway below. The women, once they were no longer
required, were dropped through these tunnels the head first.
Near the bottom of the tunnel, just above the waterline, is a
big boulder which is supposed to be struck by the head when
the body gets to the bottom. The kafir woman died then and
there and later the body floated out at high tide.
In 1947 A.D. at the time of partition of India, the Moslems on
the Pakistani side killed the Hindus and Sikhs of West Punjab.
They then forced the Hindu and Sikh women to come out in the
streets completely naked and took out a procession. No
chadors or veils for kafir women. When the terrible news
arrived in East Punjab, the Moslems of India had to undergo
the same treatment and this put a stop to such dastardly
behavior by the followers of Allah.
In Bangladesh, during the genocide of kafirs there perpetrated
by the soldiers of Islamic Pakistan, Hindu women were taken
captives and kept in the army barracks without clothes for the
enjoyment of the 'believers'. Kafir women are to be treated as
slaves of Moslems and the treatment is clearly indicated in the
Koran and the Hadis.
Kidnapping of Hindu women by Moslem gangs was once a
common feature in India. This led to many riots and many
lives were lost. In Bangladesh today, it is practically impossi-
ble for Hindu girls to go out alone in the streets to attend to
daily chores without being teased, insulted or kidnapped by the
Moslem ruffians. The recent Hindi movie entitled Umrao Jan
depicts the life of a singer named Umrao Jan. She sings very
well and is a kind of high class prostitute. The movie features
a number of songs and also shows how the inglorious life of
Umrao Jan started. She was kidnapped by a bunch of Moslem
ruffians who sold her to a Moslem woman brothel-keeper.
Umrao Jan was shown to be a Moslem girl in the movie
however. (But in real life most of the kidnappers were Moslem
ruffians and the kidnapped were kafir women.)
A number of cases have happened where Moslems have dressed
up as Hindus and then followed Hindu girls on their way to the
river for the holy bath. On the way, they pounced upon these
girls, kidnapped them, raped them and in some cases killed
them. In many instances such incidents were unreported for
fear of shame and loss of face.
c) THE WOMEN OF RAJASTHAN
Many battles were fought in Rajasthan in Northern India. The
Moslem hordes attacked the Rajput kingdoms many times and
the Rajputs fought back heriocally and defeated the Moslems
over and over again. There never was any attack on the
Moslem womenfolk or the non-combat/ants by the Rajputs.
On the other hand, if the Rajputs lost in the battle, the
Moslems let loose terror on the entire population. The
Rajputs' houses of worship were destroyed, their women raped
and carried away, their children taken away as bonded labor
and all non-combat/ants murdered.
The Rajputs soon came to know the way of the Moslems. If it
appeared that the battle could not be won, then they them-
selves killed their women and children, Masada style, and then
went to fight with the Moslems until death. In many cases,
the Rajput women took their own lives by taking poison and
then jumping into a deep fiery pit. This was called the Jauhar
Vrat or 'sacrifice of fire'. The men of course went out to fight
and died to a man.
Now, the question is why did the women jump into the fire to
be burnt alive when they were going to die of the poison
anyway? The answer is simple. If the Moslems got hold of the
dead bodies of the kafir women after victory in the battle,
they would then rape even the dead bodies of these women. It
was to prevent such 'desecration' of their own bodies after
death by poison that the Rajput women used to jump into the
pits of fire. Thus, when the Moslems finally came to the city,
they did not find a single woman's body, dead or alive. A great
disappointment!
Showing disrespect to a dead body is a typically Islamic trait.
Displaying the cut off head, or cut up body to the public to
generate terror in the minds of the public is an effective
method of subduing an otherwise rebellious population. In
Islamic states, one is forced to witness an execution often
done in public. Lashing of men and women is also often
displayed to the public and now-a-days in Pakistan they
arrange a microphone near the mouth of the victim of such
torture so that people at a distance could hear his cries.
Stoning to death of course has to be in public as otherwise all
the furniture would get damaged.
d) AFZAL KHAN'S CONCUBINES
Afzal Khan was a notorious womaniser and he had a 'haremful'
of Hindu or kafir women. No one exactly knew how many
women he had in his harem. It is estimated that he had some
300 Hindu women as slaves or concubines, not counting the
legal Moslem wives that he wedded and divorced from time to
time.
Afzal had to meet the great Hindu king Shivaji in a mortal
encounter. Afzal eventually died in the hands of Shiveji and
his forces were routed. It is said that Afzal Khan had a
premonition about his death in the hands of Shivaji who was a
great fighter. He decided to murder all his concubines before
he set out to meet the Hindu king. He himself beheaded a
great number of these unfortunate women.
When someone asked him, what if he returned safe and sound
from his meeting with the Hindu king, this Moslem chief
replied that he could procure for himself the same number of
kafir women for his 'harem' on his return, perhaps even a great
number and more beautiful ones in the bargain.
e) BRICKING UP OF WOMEN AND CHIDREN
Anarkali
The Koran says in Surah IV, Verse 15 that guilty women should
be confined to their house till death overtakes them. It is also
called the punishment of 'char-diwari' or the ~four-walls'. In
Islamic lands this is a well-known punishment.
The Mughal king Akbar once suspected a young dancer called
Anarkali (pomegranate flower) of romance with his own son,
Salim. He disapproved of this relationship as the old man
wanted the girl for himself. He had to punish her as he would
not even dare to punish his own son for this was his only Son
fathered after many tries and at the specific blessing of a holy
man called Salim Chisti. But someone had to be punished and
so it was the poor girl.
The girl was bricked in and left there to die a slow death
Even today one can visit the place where Anarkali was
murdered in this brutal manner. Her tomb is in Lahore
Pakistan.
The Daughters of the Hindu King Dahir
Dahir, the Hindu king of Sindh was defeated by the Moslems
The women of the royal family were all raped and carried
away by the ruffians after a merciless carnage. However, the
two young daughters were safely taken to West Asia for the
Moslem king who had stayed back in his capital. The girls
were presents from the general who had conquered Sindh.
The girls were supposed to be virgins which they were. But to
spite the cruel, old sex-fiend, the girls said that they were no
longer virgins and that they were made to have sex with the
general before being sent to the king. The enraged king got
his general murdered but later discovered that the girls had
lied. They were punished by being placed inside a thick wall
where they were left to die.
The Sons of Guru Gobind Singh
The Sikh Guru Gobind Singh who was eventually murdered by
the Moslems had his two sons captured by the Mughals. These
two boys were murdered the same way.
f) THE TERROR TACTICS OF ISLAM
In order to terrorise the kafirs they were murdered in other
ways too with a view to generating mortal fear in the minds of
the infidels. Akbar, after a victory on the battlefield, used to
get hold of the more prominent members of the kafir society
and impale them publicly. Any visitor visiting the dead city of
Sikandra once built by Akbar, will notice structures on either
side of the road leading to Sikandra, on top of which lances
were placed for impaling the kafirs. The great pain and the
shrieks of the unfortunate victims scared the hell out of the
Hindus who were forced to watch the gruesome scene, While
the Moslems howled for joy.
Another method was to flay alive the victims. In fact, this
ractice is very much in vogue even today in the Moslem
POuntry of Afghanistan. In Islamic Turkey too this practice
was widely followed. In Islamic Pakistan, the practice has
given rise to the common threat: "I will skin you
alive". Truly
inscrutable are the ways of the faithful!
During the reign of Abdul Hamid II, called the 'great assassin',
the Turks were responsible for the torture, robbery, slaughter
and rape of thouands of Armenians. The marauding Bashi-
gazouks of this mad sultan were notorious for running down
and ravishing women and girls while on horse-back. All
Christian males that fell into their hands were forcibly cir-
cumcised and sodomized.
The great festivity in El-Obeid upon the defeat of Hicks
Pasha's infidel army is noteworthy. The mad Messiah, E1-
Mahdi, built a pyramid of the skulls of the Christian army. In
a well near by, they threw the sex organs of the infidels.
About ten thousand Christian soldiers were thus butchered.
During the Crusades too, the Christian soldiers who fell into
the hands of the followers of Allah, had their penis cut off for
every true believer had to destroy the generative power of the
infidel before he could gain admittance into Allah's paradise.
Castration of the infidel was not only an act of piety for the
Moslems but one of shame to the kafir. The infidel's head was
severed and placed between his thighs, the seat of dishonor.
During Mughal rule in India, captive Hindus were also tortured
by infibulation or artificial phimosis (mobri, muzzling), elonga-
tion of the prepuce or foreskin and constriction of the orifice,
a painful punishment. With the Hindu women captives, often
their vulva was sewed up. Other practices involved mutilation
of the uterus by means of iron prongs, burning the breasts and
excision of the clitoris. A VERY PAINFUL PUNISHMENT
WAS SPLITTING THE PENIS OF A HINDU. THIS WAS
CALLED SUB-INCISION.
g) MURDER OF SIKH GURUS AND THEIR DISCIPLES
Guru Arjun Dev, the Sikh Guru was murdered by the Mughal
king Jahangir by forcibly making him sit on a red hot iron
plate and then pouring hot sand over him.
The murder of Guru Tegh Bahadur was no less horrendous
reminding one of the sceres of hell described in the holy
Koran. Tegh ahadur was asked by the Moslem king to
renounce his religion, the faith of Guru Nanak or Sikhism. He
refused. Moslems tried to Irighten him. They brought him to
the prison in a cage like he was a wild animal. Three of his
disciples were murdered in front of him. One was cut in two
by sawing alive as shown in the picture on page 42. Another
was boiled alive in a big cauldron (See page 46). And the third
was wrapped up in a blanket and then set on fire (See page 44).
The last fits the Koranic injunction prescribed in Surah XXII,
Verses 19-22.
h) SODOMY AMONG THE BELIEVERS
The Koran tells us of boys graced with eternal youth who will
attend the faithful in paradise. The practice of sodomy is
frowned upon in the Koran if the act takes place between two
Moslems. There is nothing mentioned about a Moslem so-
domising an infidel. This seems to have the silent approval of
Islam. Many European travelers and Christian missionaries,
unfamiliar with sodomite propensities of many Moslems, suf-
fered sexual molestation in Persia in the hands of even
government officials.
During the Napoleonic war in Egypt, Marshal Jaubert wrote to
General Bruix that: "Les Arabes et les Mameloukes ant traite
quelque~uns de nos prisonniers comme Socrate traitait, dit-
on, Alcibiade. 11 fallait pe'rir ou passer". (The Arabs and
the
Mamelukes have used some of our men captured by them like
they say Socrates used Alcibiades. It was a case of letting
them do it or die.)
Sheikh Nasr, the governor of Bushire, once said to an English
missionary: "I stopped a caravan of Jews bound for
Afghanistan, penetrating all forty of their females in one
night. They protested that such action was an outrage, but I
said the outrage was justified in that all of their offspring
would be Moslems".
i) INFILTRATION AND SUBTERFUGE
During the Crusades, the Christians had a rough time. Their
humanitarianism made them an easy prey to the Moslem spies
that had infiltrated into Christian ranks as Armenian Chris-
tians. No secret could thus be kept from the invading Saracen
armies. The situation became so serious that the Christians
had to take drastic action. The Christians had to employ the
same cruel methods of the Moslems to get rid of the false
Armenians.
One evening at dinner time, a bunch of Turkish prisoners were
killed by slitting their throats. They were then spitted and the
cooks set about roasting them. The camp was informed that
some spies had been caught and they were being roasted on the
skewer. The whole camp came running up to see if it was
really true for the Moslems did not believe that the Christians,
followers of the dictum of turning the other cheek, could
really kill the spies that way. But behold! Nothing could be
more true: the Turks were truly cooking over a hot fire. The
next morning, all the spies had disappeared in horror, even
without waiting for their wages.
j) ATTACK ON THE US EMBASSY IN PAKISTAN
The diabolical nature of the attack on the US embassy became
apparent after the fact. Some Moslems had attacked the holy
shrine at Mecca and this enraged the Moslems of Pakistan
against all non-Moslems. They just assumed that the attack
was organised by the Americans. The following extract from
Masurashram Patrika of India dated March 1982 will make one
shudder in horror:
"A typical Pakistani Islamic reaction reported in Ameri-
can papers was that while some Pakistanis themselves
mounted an attack on the Kaaba, their compatriots back
home, apparently angered by the assault, caught hold of
some helpless American women and urinated in their
mouths, obviously believing that they were in fact dis-
charging an Islamic obligation against the kafirs and an
oblation to Allah".
If you enjoyed this
article, please visit: http://www.hinduunity.org
|
|
